
State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings
Sharyn I, Smith Director and Chief Judge
Ann Cole Clerk of the Division
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee Florida 32399-3060
October 29, 1997
Angela T. Hall, Agency Clerk
Department of Health
1317 Winewood Boulevard
Building 6 Tallahassee, Florida 32399--0700
Re: Department of Health, Board of Nursing vs. Jose Proenza-
Sanfiel, DOH Case No. 97-2453
Dear Ms, Hall
Enclosed is a copy of the Recommended Order in the above-referenced case, Also enclosed are the exhibits admitted in evidence and the transcript of the final hearing.
Copies of my Recommended Order and of this letter have been furnished to all parties of record. This letter will serve to notify the parties that my Recommended Order has been forwarded to you for final action.
As required by section 120.57(1) (k), Florida Statutes (Sup. 1996), you are requested to furnish the Division of Administrative Hearings with a copy of the Final Order within 15 days of its rendition.
Sincerely,
DANIEL; M. Kilbride
Administrative Law Judge
DMK/js
enclosures
cc: Laura P. Gaffney, Esquire
Charles B. Tiffany, Esquire
Dr. James Howell, Secretary
(904) 488-9675 · SUNCOM 278-9675 · Fax filing (904) 921-6847
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BOARD OF NURSING
Petitioner
vs. Case No, 97-2453
JOSE PROENZA-SANFIEL,
Respondent.
RECOMMENDED ORDER
A formal hearing was held ill Orlando, Florida on August 20, 1997, before the Honorable Daniel M. Kilbride an Administrative Law Judge with "the. Division of Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Reginald D. Dixon, Esquire
Laura P. Gaffney, Esquire
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32308
For Respondent: Charles B. Tiffany, Esquire
Broadway Suite 203 Kissimmee, Florida 34741
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
Whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed by the Petitioner, and, if so what penalty should be imposed,
Preliminary MATTERS
On January 3a., 1997 , Petitioner issued an emergency order suspending the: Respondent’s license to practice nursing.
On April 4, 1997, petitioner filed an administrative
complaint against the Respondent alleging the same facts set forth in the emergency order and charging the Respondent with unprofessional conduct in the practice of nursing by violating the confidentiality of patients’ records and also with being unable to practice nursing with reasonable skill and safety to patients. Respondent denied the allegations and requested formal hearing. Respondent also filed an Answer to the Administrative Complaint and a Motion to Strike. This matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for adjudication on May 16, 1997. Discovery ensued, and Petitioner filed a Notice (motion) of Compelled Mental and Physical Examination on June 4, 1997. The motion was denied.
At the hearing, Petitioner voluntarily dismissed Count I of the Administrative Complaint; petitioner called four (4) witnesses and offered into evidence three (3) exhibits. Respondent testified in his own behalf and offered no exhibits into evidence. All exhibits were admitted.
The transcript was prepared and filed on September 2, /1997.
petitioner filed its proposed recommended order on September 12, 1997. Respondent filed his proposals on September 2, 1997 Both parties proposals have been given careful consideration,
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Petitioner, Department of Health is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of nursing pursuant to Chapter 20, Florida Statutes; Chapter 455, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 464, Florida Statutes.
2.Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a licensed registered nurse in the State of Florida having been issued license number RN 2523862. Respondent’s last known address is 4210 Pow's and Mia's Memorial drive, St. Cloud, Florida 34772-8242.
3.As a licensed registered nurse, Respondent Is governed by chapter 455 and 464, Florida Statutes, including Section 455,667(5), formerly 455.241(1), Florida Statures, and Chapter 59S, Florida Administrative Code,
4. At a date unknown, Respondent obtained possession of a computer from a secondhand thrift: store. it was subsequently determined that the hard drive contained a database storing confidential patient names, addresses, dates of administration, types of addiction, treatments, and psychiatric disorders for individuals treated at Charter Behavioral Health System Orlando (" Charter"). Charter is a sixty-(60) bed, full-service, psychiatric treatment hospital where patients are examined, diagnosed and/or treated fox drug, alcohol and/or mental health issues.
Respondent has prior experience as a psychiatric nurse and was well aware of the possible ramifications of allowing confidential psychiatric patient information to be accessed or viewed by unauthorized persons.
6. At no time did charter authorize the release of, or place in Respondent’s possession, the computer and/or database which identified confidential patient information.
7. However, Charter failed to ensure that the confidential information contained and the hard drive had been erased prior to its release to the thrift shop.
8. Respondent contacted law enforcement agencies in an attempt to have them investigate Charter for the alleged negligence in the release of the data. When he could not obtain their involvement, he turned to the news media.
9. Respondent contacted multiple news media in the Orlando area and allowed some members of the news media access to the information respondent indicated to them that they were to blur the information if a news story was going to be aired.
10. As a result of the Respondent’s allowing news media access to the confidential psychiatric records of the former patients of Charter, two news reports aired in Orlando and its adjacent viewing area on or about January 23, 1997.
11. On at least one of the foregoing news reports, a computer screen was shown to the general viewing public via videotape played over the air. Patient names as well as diagnoses were readily identifiable during the broadcast. it. At least one former patient was interviewed by the media. He expressed that he was tremendously distraught over the fact that his prior admission to the hospital was not kept confidential and thus exposed to the public at large.
13. The Respondent appeared on both newscasts.
14. After acknowledging that it would be negligent: for a health care professional, who has a duty to maintain confidentiality of patient information, to allow unauthorized non-medical persons to view patient records, the Respondent indicated that ha did not have a duty to maintain the confidentiality of the former patients of charter because he vas not employed as a nurse at that time.
15. On or about January 24. 1997, representatives for the agency spoke with Respondent regarding his possession of the confidential records located on the computer hard drive. The Agency representatives requested Respondent to return the confidential patient records to charter or the Agency: Respondent refused.
16. Kim Everett, Vice President of Risk Management for Charter, spoke with Respondent on or about January 24, 1997, regarding Respondent’s returning the confidential patient records to charter. Respondent indicated that he would not return the information to Charter end/or its representatives- Additionally, the Respondent indicated that he thought that he should be-compensated for returning the computer and patient records to Chapter. Ms Everett advised respondent that the information belonged to the patients and that Charter would only reimburse him for the price of the computer. Respondent indicated that he would consider contacting the patients and selling the information back to them. Ms. Everett again advised the Respondent that the information was not his and that he should not contact the patients. At the conclusion of the conversation information was still in the possession of Respondent.
17. Charter filed for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Florida. On January 27, 1997, the Honorable John N. Adams, Sr.,, Circuit Court Judge, issued an order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Injunction wherein the Court made the following Findings of Fact:
a. Patient confidential information subject to restraint from disclosure under Section 349.45919), Florida Statutes, is in the custody of persons not unauthorized to possess this information.
b. That portions of such information have been disclosed to third parties including the broadcast media.
c. That there is an imminent Risk of irreparable, harm of further disclosure of such confidential information.
18. Dr. Roger Goetz, M.D., an expert on the handling of psychiatric records by health care professionals has opined that it is below the standard of professional care to allow unauthorized non-medical persons access to confidential patient information. However, this opinion was not supported by other evidence and is not accepted.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties. Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
20. Petitioner is charged with the regulation of the practice of nursing. The Board of Nursing may discipline a person found guilty of violating the provision of Section 464.018, Florida Statutes.
21. Petitioner must prove the material allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint: by clear and convincing evidence. Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 ( Fla. 1967)
22. section 455.667(5), Florida Statutes formerly 455.241(2), Florida statutes, regarding confidentiality of patient records, provides that patient information may not be furnished to, and the medical condition of a patient may not be discussed with, any person other than the patient or the patient’s Legal representative or other health care providers involved in the care or treatment of the patient, except upon written authorization of the patient.
23. The release Of confidential psychiatric patient information to unauthorized non-medical persons poses a substantial threat to the public. The Respondent admitted that he was well aware that the release or psychiatric patient information to an unauthorized non-medical person would pose a threat to the public as well as cause irreparable harm to the patients. In fact, Respondent opined that it would he negligent behavior for a person or an entity to allow third parties to have access to such information.
24. Because Respondent was having trouble contacting the proper authorities, he became angry and he decided to share his discovery with members of the news media, However, Respondent thought he took measures to ensure his name was not used because he was afraid that, in his own words it would ‘upset psychiatric patient seeking me out. The Respondent then struck a deal with the news media that they could view the information to verify its authenticity so long as they agreed to blur the information during the broadcast access to the confidential patient information, a news story was aired in the Orlando and adjacent viewing area wherein confidential patient information war clearly discernible. Additionally, at lease one patient was contacted and interviewed by the media. This patient was distraught over the fact that his confidential patient information was exposed to the public,
26. The Respondent’s release of the confidential psychiatric patient information to the media was intentional, regardless of whether or not he intended fox them to blur the names
27, This intentional release of confidential patient information to the media was unprofessional and 9 violation of the statute.
28. When representatives from Charter and the Agency attempted to gain possession of the computer and the records from the Respondent, ha became belligerent, He indicated that he did not take kindly to being threatened, and refused their request.
29. Section 46(.01611) (1) provides that the Board of Nursing may discipline a licensee for violating Rule 59S-8.005(l)(e), Florida Administrative Code, by violating the confidentiality of information or Knowledge concerning a patient. petitioner has proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section 468.018(1)(2), Florida statutes?, by violating Rule 599-8.005(1) (1)12. Florida administrative Code.
30. Section 464.018(1) (2), Florida Statutes, provides that the Board of nursing may discipline 8 licensee for violating Rule 59S-8.005(1) (e)12, Florida Administrative Code, by acts of negligence, gross negligence, either by omission or commission. Petitioner has proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section 464.018(1) (1), Florida Statutes, by violating Rule 599-8.005(2) (e)12, Florida Administrative Code.
31. Section 466.018(1) (1), Florida Statutes, provides that the Board of nursing may discipline a licensee for violating Rule 598-8.005(1) (e)13, Florida Administrative Code, by Failing to conform to the minimal standards of acceptable, prevailing nursing practice regardless of whether or not actual injury to a patient was sustained. Petitioner has failed to grove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated
31. Rule 595-8.006(3), Florida Administrative Code, provides a penalty range for violations
of 464.018(1)(1), Florida Statutes.33. Section 485.237(1)(k), Florida Statutes, provides that the Board of Nursing may discipline a licensee for failing to perform the statutory and/or legal obligations placed upon licensees pursuant to Section
455.241(21).34, Respondent has proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section
455.227(1)(k), Florida Statutes, by failing to perform the statutory and/or legal obligations placed upon Respondent pursuant to Section 455.241(2).35. Section
455.227(2), Florida Statutes, provides a penalty range for a violation of Chapter 455, Florida Statutes, of a reprimand, a fine or up to $5,000 per count, suspension, or permanent revocation of license.
36.
Section 464.018(1)(j) provides that the Board of Nursing may discipline a licensee for being unable to practice nursing with reasonable skill and safety to patients.37. Respondent has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated section
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Board of Nursing enter a final order finding the
Respondent guilty on Count II for violating Sections 464.018(1) (1), Florida Statutes, by knowingly violating Rule 59S-8.005 (1) (e) 5, Florida Administrative Code; guilty on Count II, pursuant to section 464.018(1) 11), Florida Statutes, for knowingly violating Rule 598-8.005(1) (e) (12), Florida Administrative Code; not guilty of Count IV; guilty on Count V for Violating Section 455.241(2), Florida Statutes; not guilty On Count VII and not guilty on Count VII.It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Board of Nursing dismiss Counts IV, VI, and VII of the Administrative Complaint and impose the following discipline on the Respondent’s license:
administrative fine of $500 administrative costs of the Department Eighteen (19) month suspension of license with credit for time of suspension already serves: and five (5) year probation upon such terms and conditions as the Board may find lust and proper.DONE .AND ENTERED this 29 Th. day of October, 1997, in Tallahassee Leon County, Florida.
M.
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1930 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 31999-3060
(904) 488-9675 Suncom 278-9675
Fax Filing (804) 921-6947
piled with the Clerk of the Division or Administrative Bearings this 29 Th. day of October, 1997.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Laura P. Gaffney, Esquire
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Charles B. Tiffany, Esquire
120 Broadway, Suite 203 Kissimmee, Florida 38381
Angels T. Ball, Agency Clerk
Department of Health 1317 Winewood Boulevard
Building 6 Tallahassee, Florida 39399-0700
Dr. James Howell, Secretary
1317 Winewood Boulevard
Building 6, Boom 306 Tallahassee, Florida 38399-0700
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions Within 15 days from the date of the Recommended Order, Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final order in this case.
Webmaster's Comments.
Remember all the charges that we started out with.?
How quickly they start to disappear and yet they still continue to prosecute me and persecute me. Is this not abuse of power?Webmaster's Comments.
**************** NOTE OF INTEREST *************************
I have been caring for the American Way of life for a while now.... you can see the other part of me on the other Web Site that I also maintain. That Web-Site deal's with the POW/MIA Issue Please visit it and get involved there are still men left behind and they need your help also. Visit " THE REAPER'S EDGE A POW's SCREAMED ECHO IN CYBERSPACE "
Back to starting page. ..Contacting Jose via E-ail..Mailto:onenurse@noangle.com
If you are doing word search document contains some of this words: Negligence, Psychiatric, abuse, of, power, collusion, Florida, department of health, Florida agency of healthcare administration, violation of civil rights, bad government bad psychiatry, warning to patients nurses, charter hospital, surviving psychiatry, deceptive, malpractice, weird, injustice, nursing, advocate, nursing code, ethics, legal rape, fraud, defrauding Medicaid, Medicare, Institutions, federal, outrage, criminal, disbelief, Human, health, services, personal, disregard, reporting, crime, trouble, revenge, sexual, consent, permission, renegade, rebuttal, journalism, independence, militia, revolution, inspection, perception, rejection, repugnant, personal, integrity, professional, pervert, prostitution, system, board of nursing, freedom, seclusion, restraint, medication, psychotropic, intimidation, feminism , repulsion, judicial, regulation, self-esteem , corporate, individual, actions, reactions, pervasive, reluctant, devil, worship, rape, drunkenness, cross-dressing, gay, lesbian, protection, persuasion, despair, rejection, opposition, ignorance, reprisal, depotism, dependence, independence, parent, child, bastard, protection, consumer, deception, outrage, insult, intelligence, intervention, guilt, obstruction, political, embarrassment, depotism, nazi, mad, upset, sadist, masochist, disruption, life, important, decision, autonomy, obligation, WESH, wesh-2, WCPX, wcpx-6, wkmg, wkmg-6, WFTV, wftv-9, ABC, CBS, NBC, network, television, programming, reporting, broadcasting, broadcast media, newspaper, article, story. Managed care, HMO, trust, Public, servant, malpractice, aclu,1st amendment, constitution, betrayal, liberty, assumption, alleged, antitrust, monopoly, indigent, help, accuracy, independent, love, caring, hate, disobedience,